WASHINGTON (AP) — A divided Supreme Court ruled Thursday that authorities do not have to provide a quick hearing when they seize cars and other property used in drug crimes, even when the property belongs to so-called innocent owners.
By a 6-3 vote, the justices rejected the claims of two Alabama women who had to wait more than a year for their cars to be returned. Police had stopped the cars when they were being driven by other people and, after finding drugs, seized the vehicles.
Civil forfeiture allows authorities to take someone’s property, without having to prove that it has been used for illicit purposes. Critics of the practice describe it as “legalized theft.”
Justice Brett Kavanaugh wrote for the conservative majority that a civil forfeiture hearing to determine whether an owner will lose the property permanently must be timely. But he said the Constitution does not also require a separate hearing about whether police may keep cars or other property in the meantime.
Pogacar extends Giro lead to over 7 minutes after winning altered Stage 16 amid protests at start
Dame Joan Collins looks glamorous in a black satin dress with semi
Romanian artists share China travel experiences
Spice Girls star Mel B signs 'six
Dame Joan Collins looks glamorous in a black satin dress with semi
A kidnapped Pakistani judge has been freed in a late
Woman dies, 2 others hospitalized after mass drug overdose in Australia's Queensland
PHOTOS: At the Pet Gala, fashion goes to the dogs
China's bond market issuances hit 7.16 trillion yuan in March